Our mission
Every inventor shipping an app, workflow, or technical idea should know — in minutes, not months — whether it has a realistic path to patent protection and what to strengthen first. We are the smart pre-attorney step: not a law firm, but a preparation platform that makes attorney time count.
Who we are
Patent PreCheck was created by a team of experienced entrepreneurs who faced the same challenges that brought you to our site — wondering whether an idea or codebase is worth protecting, how strong it really is, and what to fix before spending on counsel or filing fees.
We built a faster, code-first way to assess patentability and filing readiness, designed around how inventors actually work today: in AI-assisted IDEs, with real source code, not pitch decks alone.
We combine daily-updated legal intelligence, prior art search, and interactive coaching tuned for source code so you can strengthen your position in days, not months.
Contact: Send us a message or email info@patentprecheck.com
10810 N. Tatum Blvd. #102-109, Phoenix, AZ 85028
What makes us different
- Code-first analysis — we score your actual source, region by region, against four statutory pillars plus human inventorship.
- Human conception scoring — a distinct human-contribution signal for AI-assisted and hand-written code alike.
- Interactive coaching — live edits that raise scores, not a one-shot PDF.
- Daily legal intelligence — Alice, §101–§103, and Federal Circuit updates feed scoring context (see feeds).
- Meet builders where they work — check patentability right inside Claude, Cursor, ChatGPT, GitHub, and the command line, not just on our website.
Methodology & transparency
Scores are directional models grounded in prosecution patterns, rejection data, and our indexed prior-art corpus — not guarantees. Read how scoring works, review a sample report, and see how we scored ourselves in the case study.
Legal disclaimer
Patent PreCheck is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice. We do not replace a licensed patent attorney for filing decisions, claim drafting, or freedom-to-operate opinions.