Prior art, pillar scores, and a proceed / caution / stop verdict in about 60 seconds — no account, no card.
Analysis failed. Please try again.
Your free screen shows where you stand. The Interactive Code Review grades examiner-style pillars and gives specific fixes.
Patent law requires the content to fit one of four categories: a process (method or algorithm), a machine (device with parts), a manufacture (article from raw materials), or a composition (chemical or compound). Try pasting actual code or a technical description of your invention.
Was this analyzed in error? You can provide a more complete description and try again.
—
Already shared this publicly? A blog post, article, Reddit or Hacker News post, public repo, demo, conference talk, or product launch all count as public disclosure. Tell us the earliest date and we’ll estimate your US filing deadline — it’s saved with your report.
Patterns from indexed USPTO examination records and abandoned applications in your technical area — not a prediction about your filing.
One step left: your online report link is created when you save this report by email. Enter your email below — the link arrives in the email and unlocks the “View report online” button here.
One email — we send your scores, pillar findings, and report ID (e.g. PPC-2026-05-24-ABCDE), and use the same address if you re-analyze this invention (up to five free runs per paste). Optional alerts when patent law shifts for inventions like yours.
Need the document and legal watch? The Filing Packet ($199) adds provisional Word/PDF, forms guidance, guided filing paths, and 30 days of monitoring.
Sample report · How scoring works · Case study · Security
No report was generated for this submission, so PDF, online, and email options are unavailable.