At a glance
| Patent PreCheck | Evalify | |
|---|---|---|
| Primary input | Source code + disclosure | Pitch deck / product brief |
| Output | USPTO pillar scores + coached edits + Word/ZIP | FTO-style assessment report |
| Coaching | 30-day interactive code review | Static PDF-style report |
| Human vs AI inventorship | Core feature | Not emphasized |
| Typical price | Free score; $69.95 review | ~$249/report (volume credits) |
| Best for | Developers preparing to file | Founders / VCs screening deck risk |
Evalify pricing and features based on public positioning as of 2026; verify on evalify.ai before purchasing either product.
When Patent PreCheck is the better fit
- You have working code in Cursor, Copilot, or Claude and need inventorship documentation.
- You want pillar-by-pillar fixes (Alice, novelty, enablement) on your actual implementation.
- You need a filing-ready package for counsel at a one-time price, not per-deck FTO.
When Evalify may fit better
- You are an investor or accelerator screening many pitch decks for litigation/FTO risk.
- You do not have source code yet — only a product narrative or deck.
Also compare: vs Patentable.app · vs Google Patents · full compare hub
Score your code — free in 60 seconds